Home ESSHC | Home IISH
 
8th European Social Science History Conference Ghent, Belgium April 2010
 
Browse Networks  
    or search for  



Programme

Menu
Tuesday 13 April
   8.30
   10.45
   14.15
   16.30
Wednesday 14 April
   8.30
   10.45
   14.15
   16.30
Thursday 15 April
   8.30
   10.45
   14.15
   16.30
Friday 16 April
   8.30
   10.45
   14.15
   16.30

All days

Russia's citizens of different formal ethnicity: Ethnic self-definition and desire to live in Another Country.
This paper presents some results of the analysis* (with all necessary historical references) aimed to examine relationships between citizens' ethnic self-definitions and desires to live in another country or to stay in the Russian Federation. The desires of respondents, whose formal ethnicity*** and ethnic self-definitions coincided were not affected by their ethnic self-definitions. But the desires of respondents, whose formal and self-defined ethnicity didn't coincide, were significantly interrelated with their ethnic self-definitions. These respondents have perceived their formal ethnicity as "empty and senseless records" in their documents. A part of them wished to live in Germany, Greece, Georgia, etc. in order to realize their dreams "to be completely integrated in a society, where people of the same ethnicity are the dominant ethnic majority of a true language and alive authentic culture". "People perceive me as a Georgian or an Armenian, or even as a Chechen, etc., but never as a 'Rooskiji'** (ethnic Russian) or as a Greek, whom I was written. In fact, I am rather a 'Rooskiji' by my language and culture, than a Greek. In Russia you can't be a real Greek, even if you want. So, I'd like to live in Greece in order that my children could become true Greeks". However, ethnic self-definitions of the other part of these respondents were strongly influenced by their prior desires to live in a country as the USA, Canada, Australia, France, etc. Nevertheless their ethnic self-definitions, they wished to get rid of belonging to any ethnic group for to become a full value citizen of a really civilized and democratic nation. And contrary, the desires "to stay" of the last part of this type respondents were sufficiently influenced by their conscious and motivated self-definitions as members of the Russian civil culture and growing civil nation, though most of them were not 'Rooskie' by officially prescribed ethnic labels. The analyses revealed close three-way interrelations between respondents' desires as well as formal and self-defined ethnicity. It showed that any discrimination of citizens for their formal ethnicity or an impossibility of full realization of their self-definitions strongly influences their desires to emigrate to a more humane and civilized society. * Surveys were conducted by the Independent Sociological Centre "On Emigration Research". A statistical survey (N=624) was done in 2005 and 63 in-depth interviews were done in 2006. At the time all respondents were citizens of the Russian Federation of different formal ethnicity: ethnic Russians (self-ethnonym is "Rooskie")**, Germans, Greeks, Armenians, Georgians and Ukrainians. The mother tongue of all of respondents was the Russian language. All field works were done by "The All-Russian Levada-Centre of Public Opinion Research" in Saratov, Engels, St. Petersburg, and Moscow. ** 'Rooskie' (singular - 'Rooskiji') are indigenous descendants of East Slavic people of Byzantine-Russian Orthodox culture, and of baptized in people, whatever their ethnic origin. But after 2003, the word means also the Russians as a nation of citizens who are natives of the Russian Language and Russian civil culture. *** Multifaceted "Formal E." is analyzed here as socially prescribed and severely fixed labels of ethnicity as records in citizens' birth certificates and internal Soviet and post-Soviet passports before 2003 by their parents' ethnicity (in mixed cases by a citizen's choice between).